The “Work Authorization Issue” has been rolling on in the media over the last few weeks, with stories appearing in the New York Times, Huffington Post, and San Jose Mercury News among other papers. In addition to the letter sent out by Pomona College President David Oxtoby (to which I previously posted my thoughts), there have been postings to Facebook by Jennifer Wilcox, the college’s Young Alumni Trustee, and, Friday, a new letter from Dodie Bump, the President of the Pomona College Alumni Association.
These communications have all struggled to represent the issues of work authorization and the dining hall workers’ unionization effort as entirely separate issues. This last letter from Bump, for example, argues that the timing of the work authorization issue and the unionization effort “was truly a tragic coincidence,” and that “as an anti-union tactic, this would have been pretty stupid.” I don’t think anyone is arguing that a union-busting move like this would be especially clever — Machiavellian, perhaps, or pragmatic, depending upon your views. In any case, let’s give the College the benefit of the doubt for a moment, and discuss the question: what would lead the College to get into a situation where such a “tragic coincidence” could occur?
We need to start by being honest. The College has been unequivocally against the unionization effort1. President Oxtoby has publicly criticized the idea in a letter to the school. The College has had to settle a complaint with the NLRB over practices (admittedly, while denying wrongdoing) related to the dining hall employees and union efforts. And when the “tragic coincidence” occurred, who did the College opt to bring to handle the investigation? Why, in a tragic coincidence, they selected a law firm that is known for union-busting — one that even brags about it on their web site.
My speculation, based purely upon experiences in other institutions, is that some individual did, in fact, trigger the authorization issue as an anti-union tactic — although, perhaps, without the authorization or approval of the administration. The College’s reaction has had all the hallmarks of an institution “circling the wagons” and doing damage control for ill-advised actions by one member. Yes, the action achieved the desired effect and disrupted the unionization effort, but it also has had (and will continue to have) consequences far beyond the original intent.
Dodie’s letter calls for the community to move on, stop finger-pointing, and begin the healing. I agree, there is an excellent opportunity here. Pomona could demonstrate its commitment to its people, and show that it has been dealing in good faith: with the College’s legal and financial resources, Pomona could promote healing by helping the fired workers obtain whatever authorizations the law requires. Sponsor them for green cards, say, or H2B visas at the very least. No question it would be expensive and time consuming, but such action would go great lengths to disprove the accusations of the College’s detractors. It would show that Pomona is dedicated to doing the right thing.
As a small business owner, I fully understand the importance of controlling costs. But I also know that costs are just one part of the equation, and that a business’ good name and positive reputation are vital to its survival. Pomona is known for being one of the top five liberal arts institutions in the United States. What sets it apart from the many other colleges and universities? Time and again, people cite the small, personal nature of Pomona. The College doesn’t just have outstanding faculty, but has outstanding faculty who truly care about the students. The Administration fosters faculty and provides freedom and opportunities unmatched by other institutions. College is not merely a place for academic growth, but for all forms of personal growth, and Pomona is known to offer an ideal environment for development. This is why students turn down larger institutions like Stanford, Berkeley, or Ivy League Colleges to attend Pomona.
By not extending the nurturing environment to the entire college community, however, Pomona risks losing the bright shine from its reputation. Creating a caste system, where one group is cultivated and another group is repressed is antithetical to the principles upon which Pomona was founded. It may make sense from the perspective of running a for-profit business, but that is not what Pomona represents. Having unionized dining-hall workers would increase Pomona’s cost of doing business. However, this increase in cost is nothing compared to the damage that would be done if people started perceiving the College as just another uncaring corporate institution.
1 Despite this opposition to the workers unionizing, these communications from Pomona have all included the somewhat mysterious statement that the College can’t initiate a unionization vote. It’s an odd statement to make. No one has accused Pomona of failing to initiate a vote. The accusation is that the College is hindering the effort of the workers to get to the point where they can initiate a vote themselves.