(inspired by a wise Mastodon thread)

It made me think that a lot of people’s real hobby is gatekeeping, but they apply it to different avocations.

Way back in the ’90s I was a member of a photography club. Each month, there would be a competition among members. Pictures were scored from 1-5 on each of three criteria, which were something like technical expertise, aesthetics, and realization of the month’s theme. Everything was highly formalized with rules. Entries could only be recent slides, must comply with very specific labelling requirements, and so on, but the rules didn’t end there. Interpretation of the theme had to be extremely literal. I was lectured about frivolity on more than one occasion when using the theme metaphorically.

In the technical category, there were also a lot of absolutes. Visible grain in an image at normal magnification was an immediate disqualification. Technical points were deducted if there was anything remotely out of focus. Portraits which were allowed to have bokeh — but only if you couldn’t determine how many blades the lens diaphragm had. Furthermore, it was considered a technical flaw to have a portrait where the subject’s nose broke the outline of their face or had more than one reflected light visible in each eye. It wasn’t considered good form to mention make of the camera during the competition itself, but everybody knew who shot Leicas or had Zeiss lenses on their Nikons, and this influenced technical scores accordingly.

But beyond these kinds of rules, one of the old-timers had developed a set of “aesthetic guidelines” which were ruthlessly applied (in retrospect, these may have been born of some form of OCD). Two points would be subtracted from any image’s aesthetic score if there was water breaking the bottom of the frame “because that’s bad composition.” Any image that was brighter near the bottom than the top lost points. Landscapes that were not black and white had to have a person or a horse visible “to create interest.” Pictures of urban or industrial scenes had to be taken in hard daylight, while pictures of nature would lose points for not being taken at the Golden Hour. Pictures of people had to have an even number of eyes visible. Lines always had to lead into the image and never out.

I remember on one occasion, two of the judges arguing about a picture’s aesthetic qualities and one finally taking out a tape measure to confirm that the eye of a seabird was not exactly 33% from two edges of the frame. He triumphantly reduced the picture’s score for violating the “rule of thirds.”

I tried to participate on their terms for a lot longer than I should have. I was routinely chastised for not taking photography seriously because I didn’t study up on the rules. Needless to say, I eventually quit. I’d lost a lot of enthusiasm for photography, and it took a long time to get excited about it again.

I see this as a common thing in “typical guy hobbies” be they photography, cars, phones, motorcycles, programming languages, computers, guitars, knives, operating systems, guns, bicycles, or gaming systems. It often manifests as confusing the gear with the hobby, but also devolves into arguments about X being better than Y. It turns out that arguing in-group / out-group status is more interesting for a lot of folks than the hobby they’re ostensibly enjoying.

“Forget that stuff,” I yell (trying to convince myself and everyone else). Go out and do the thing, use what you’ve got, and enjoy it. That’s the real point, after all.

A window frame like this is a good way to test lens distortion and/or your post-processing workflow. As much as I hate it, Adobe Lightroom did a reasonably good job compensating for the lens distortion.

1/1000sec at f/8. Nikon D780, VR 28-300 f/3.5-5.6G at 82mm.

I keep some directories synchronized between my notebook and desktop with rsync. After upgrading my desktop to Mac OS 15.4.1, I started getting errors:

[sjg@BigThud 2025-04-21 13:01:05] ~/Documents/Backup
$ rsync -auP . sjg@10.3.2.xx:Documents/Backup
(sjg@10.3.2.xx) Password:
rsync: failed to set times on "/Users/sjg/Documents/Backup/Whatever": Operation not permitted (1)

Interestingly, ssh also showed an error:

[sjg@BigThud 2025-04-21 13:04:29] ~/Documents/Backup
$ ssh sjg@10.3.2.xx "ls /Users/sjg/Documents/Backup/Whatever"
(sjg@10.3.2.xx) Password:
ls: /Users/sjg/Documents/Backup/Whatever: Operation not permitted

On the desktop, I look again at Documents/Backup/Whatever, and the permissions are fine. What gives?

To make a long story short, something in the latest update on the desktop changed sshd‘s full disk access permission. Looking at System Preferences > Privacy & Security > Full Disk Access, sshd-keygen-wrapper was checked, so it should have been enabled. I tried toggling that, but it didn’t help.

Apparently, the sshd-keygen-wrapper was pointing at an old version or something? I had to go into System Preferences > General > Sharing and turn Remote Login off then on again, then go into System Preferences > Privacy & Security > Full Disk Access and re-enable sshd-keygen-wrapper.

Et voilà, I could ssh and rsync again!

I don’t want to use biometrics on my phone. There are a lot of reasons, most of them not very good for a nobody like me. Still, I like reading about OPSEC and thinking about it.

Biometrics are not revocable like a code. That may seem like a strange concern, but if, say, your fingerprint gets reproduced on the internet, there’s no way to prevent its abuse. People have 3D-printed fingers in gelatin with a captured image and gotten past phone fingerprint sensors. Many years ago when I was in the aerospace industry, we’d joke about the Russians “borrowing” your head if they wanted to get through the retina scanner at a secure facility. Again, do I have this kind of security requirements? No, but I still don’t want to use biometrics.

For the longest time, I couldn’t find the way to get Apple to honor my preference. I get a daily pop-up telling me to “finish setting up your phone.” Naturally, it pops up when I’m in the middle of a phone call and trying to do something with my calendar or something, and it gets in the way. Furthermore, it’s disrespectful. I don’t want to set up Face ID. Stop bugging me, Apple!

I used to be able to click into Preferences > Finish Setting Up Your iPhone and clicking the “Set up later…” button on each feature I didn’t want. Now there’s only an “Enable” feature. But it turns out that you can click the “Enable” and then “Cancel” when it asks for your passcode. This stops the nagging.

Apple has always thought they know best how you should be using their products. I’m finding it increasingly annoying. Why should each update turn on Apple Intelligence? I don’t want “AI” just as much as I don’t want biometrics.

I don’t want to go full Luddite, but maybe it’s time for me to start thinking more along the lines of a dumber phone.